Health Insurance Blues: Give Choice a Chance The nation’s
largest health insurer, UnitedHealth Group, wants to buy up Sierra
Health Services in Nevada. The merger would give the new company a
virtual monopoly over health insurance in the Silver State, reducing
competition, which usually means increasing costs. Supporters, however,
say the merger will actually reduce costs and improve service due to
the efficiencies of scale the giant conglomerate will enjoy.
Nevertheless, being a free-market kinda guy I haven’t yet heard any
compelling reason for the government to block this merger of two
private companies. And the fact that the self-serving Culinary Union is
now in open opposition to the takeover tends to weather-vane me in the
opposite direction.
No, the answer to legitimate concerns about giving UnitedHealth a
virtual monopoly over the health insurance market in Nevada isn’t to
block the takeover of Sierra Health Services, but to open Nevada’s
market to interstate competition. In this age of Amazon and eBay, it
makes no sense whatsoever that Nevadans are prohibited from buying
health insurance from a company located in another state.
And yet, thanks to an anachronistic law passed in 1945, the
McCarran-Ferguson Act, combined with the lobbying power of Big
Insurance, there is no competitive interstate insurance market similar
to the highly competitive interstate banking market. For example,
Nevadans can deal with a relatively small local bank or choose to deal
with a big interstate bank such as Bank of America or Wells Fargo. Both
entities thrive in Nevada and consumers, armed with market choice,
benefit greatly.
Not so when it comes to health insurance companies. Why not?
Because state legislators want to retain the ability to force insurance
companies to foot the bill and cover expensive benefits which they
don’t have the guts to sock directly to taxpayers. These are called
“mandates” - as in, the legislature makes it mandatory that the
insurance company cover them or the insurance company doesn’t get to
operate in Nevada. Yes, legal extortion.
Around the country, many states force insurance companies to cover
benefits ranging from acupuncture to marriage counseling; from
contraceptives to hearing aids to hairpieces; from podiatry to
osteopathy; from chiropractors to even massage therapy. All in all,
there are over 1,800 such mandates found across the country. And these
mandates jack up the cost of insurance, creating a huge difference in
premium costs between some states.
For example, a recent e-HealthInsurance.com study showed that a healthy
25-year-old male could pick up a basic health insurance policy in
Kentucky for $960 a year. That same policy in New Jersey, however,
would set the lad back a staggering $5,880 a year.
And the Wall Street Journal noted that the same study “found that a
typical insurance policy - $2,000 deductible, 20% co-insurance – for a
family of four could be had for as little as $172 per month in a
reasonably regulated locality like Kansas City, Missouri. But in New
York that family’s only option – managed care – would run $840 per
month, and in New Jersey family policies run a whopping $1,200-plus.”
Why shouldn’t a family in New York be able to purchase that far less expensive policy from the Missouri company?
If you want to shrink the ranks of the uninsured, perhaps it’s time to
open the market and reduce the cost so that average people can afford
basic coverage without all the government mandated frills. Instead of
blocking the mergers of health insurance companies in one state,
perhaps it’s time to open up the competition among all 50 states?
Rep. John Shadegg, Arizona Republican, has proposed just such
legislation in Congress; however, Congress in the hands of
pro-union/anti-free market Democrats and is unlikely to act favorably
on such a common-sense, cost-free solution to the health care insurance
problem. Which is why state legislatures should take the lead and open
up their own markets without waiting for the feds.
Let’s give choice a chance.
By Chuck Muth
Monday, August 6, 2007
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., talks about
the influence of health care lobbyists in crafting health care
legislation during the Yearly Kos Convention's Presidential Leadership
Forum in Chicago, Saturday, Aug. 4, 2007. (AP Photo/Charles Rex
Arbogast)
Related Media:
VIDEO:
Simon Says: Save for long-term care
VIDEO:
Drink to Your Health
Comments